Clarence Jenkins, Jr. v. Amazon.com DEDC, LLC
| CLARENCE B. JENKINS, JR. |
| AMAZON.COM DEDC, LLC, Employer and AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier |
| 22-1849 |
| August 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Empl |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Clarence Jenkins, Jr. v. Amazon.com DEDC, LLC |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RESTRICTED ACCESS DOCUMENT (court & party access only) filed by Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr. Document Title: Exhibits to Informal Brief. Full document restriction required due to: other . [1001226010] [22-1849] KH [Entered: 09/07/2022 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr. [1001226002] [22-1849] KH [Entered: 09/07/2022 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 3:21-cv-03734-TLW. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001219376] [22-1849] KH [Entered: 08/26/2022 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Clarence Jenkins, Jr. [1001211148] Informal Opening Brief due 09/06/2022 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-1849] KH [Entered: 08/12/2022 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001211139]. Due: 08/26/2022. [22-1849] KH [Entered: 08/12/2022 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:21-cv-03734-TLW. Case manager: KHancock. [1001211126] [22-1849] KH [Entered: 08/12/2022 01:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
