Hong Tang v. Kurt Schmoke
Plaintiff / Appellant: HONG TANG
Defendant / Appellee: KURT L. SCHMOKE, in his official and individual capacities, DARLENE BRANNIGAN SMITH, in her official capacity, JOSEPH S. WOOD, in his official and individual capacities, KATHLEEN ANDERSON, in her official and individual capacities, ROGER E. HARTLEY, in his official capacity, CHRISTY LEE KOONTZ, in her official and individual capacities, PATRIA DE LANCER JULNES, in her official and individual capacities, CATHERINE F. ANDERSEN, in her official capacity and UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE
Case Number: 22-1889
Filed: August 25, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 20, 2023 Hong Tang v. Kurt Schmoke

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 21 ] Number of days granted: 12., extending informal briefing order deadlines. Any Informal Response Brief due 11/07/2022. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Hong Tang. [1001250837] [22-1889] JH [Entered: 10/19/2022 12:10 PM]
October 19, 2022 Filing 21 MOTION by Catherine F. Andersen, Kathleen Anderson, Roger E. Hartley, Patria De lancer Julnes, Christy Lee Koontz, Kurt L. Schmoke, Darlene Brannigan Smith, University of Baltimore and Joseph S. Wood to extend filing time for response brief until November 5, 2022.. Date and method of service: 10/19/2022 US mail. [1001250705] [22-1889] Lillian Reynolds [Entered: 10/19/2022 10:59 AM]
October 12, 2022 Filing 20 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Hong Tang. [1001246125] [22-1889] TB [Entered: 10/12/2022 12:19 PM]
October 12, 2022 Filing 19 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hong Tang. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No. [1001246121] [22-1889] TB [Entered: 10/12/2022 12:18 PM]
October 6, 2022 Filing 18 DOCKETING FORMS FOLLOW-UP NOTICE ISSUED to Hong Tang re: filing of disclosure form. Mailed to: Hong Tang. [1001243084] [22-1889] TB [Entered: 10/06/2022 08:39 AM]
September 16, 2022 Filing 17 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Joseph S. Wood. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001231263] [22-1889] Lillian Reynolds [Entered: 09/16/2022 12:25 PM]
September 16, 2022 Filing 16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by University of Baltimore. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001231261] [22-1889] Lillian Reynolds [Entered: 09/16/2022 12:24 PM]
September 16, 2022 Filing 15 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Darlene Brannigan Smith. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001231259] [22-1889] Lillian Reynolds [Entered: 09/16/2022 12:23 PM]
September 16, 2022 Filing 14 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kurt L. Schmoke. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001231257] [22-1889] Lillian Reynolds [Entered: 09/16/2022 12:22 PM]
September 16, 2022 Filing 13 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Christy Lee Koontz. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001231251] [22-1889] Lillian Reynolds [Entered: 09/16/2022 12:21 PM]
September 16, 2022 Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Patria De lancer Julnes. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001231247] [22-1889] Lillian Reynolds [Entered: 09/16/2022 12:20 PM]
September 16, 2022 Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Roger E. Hartley. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001231246] [22-1889] Lillian Reynolds [Entered: 09/16/2022 12:19 PM]
September 16, 2022 Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kathleen Anderson. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001231244] [22-1889] Lillian Reynolds [Entered: 09/16/2022 12:18 PM]
September 16, 2022 Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Catherine F. Andersen. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001231242] [22-1889] Lillian Reynolds [Entered: 09/16/2022 12:17 PM]
September 16, 2022 Filing 8 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Lillian Lane Reynolds for Catherine F. Andersen, Kathleen Anderson, Roger E. Hartley, Patria De lancer Julnes, Christy Lee Koontz, Kurt L. Schmoke, Darlene Brannigan Smith, University of Baltimore and Joseph S. Wood. [1001231241] [22-1889] Lillian Reynolds [Entered: 09/16/2022 12:16 PM]
September 16, 2022 Filing 7 DOCKETING FORMS FOLLOW-UP NOTICE ISSUED to Catherine F. Andersen, Kathleen Anderson, Roger E. Hartley, Patria De lancer Julnes, Christy Lee Koontz, Kurt L. Schmoke, Darlene Brannigan Smith, University of Baltimore and Joseph S. Wood re: filing of disclosure form and filing of appearance form. Disclosure statement due on 09/19/2022. Appearance form due on 09/19/2022 from Lillian Lane Reynolds. [1001231178] [22-1889] TB [Entered: 09/16/2022 11:05 AM]
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 5 ]. Number of days granted: 22. Informal Opening Brief due 10/11/2022. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Hong Tang. [1001231157] [22-1889] TB [Entered: 09/16/2022 10:46 AM]
September 15, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION by Hong Tang to extend filing time for informal opening brief until 10/11/2022. Date and method of service: 09/13/2022 US mail. [1001231154] [22-1889] TB [Entered: 09/16/2022 10:45 AM]
August 29, 2022 Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:22-cv-00341-SAG. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001219828] [22-1889] TB [Entered: 08/29/2022 09:42 AM]
August 25, 2022 Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001218339]. Due: 09/08/2022. [22-1889] TB [Entered: 08/25/2022 12:22 PM]
August 25, 2022 Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Hong Tang. [1001218329] Informal Opening Brief due 09/19/2022. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-1889] TB [Entered: 08/25/2022 12:15 PM]
August 25, 2022 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:22-cv-00341-SAG. Case manager: TBarton. [1001218327] [22-1889] TB [Entered: 08/25/2022 12:13 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Hong Tang v. Kurt Schmoke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: HONG TANG
Represented By: Hong Tang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KURT L. SCHMOKE, in his official and individual capacities
Represented By: Lillian Lane Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DARLENE BRANNIGAN SMITH, in her official capacity
Represented By: Lillian Lane Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOSEPH S. WOOD, in his official and individual capacities
Represented By: Lillian Lane Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KATHLEEN ANDERSON, in her official and individual capacities
Represented By: Lillian Lane Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ROGER E. HARTLEY, in his official capacity
Represented By: Lillian Lane Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHRISTY LEE KOONTZ, in her official and individual capacities
Represented By: Lillian Lane Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PATRIA DE LANCER JULNES, in her official and individual capacities
Represented By: Lillian Lane Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CATHERINE F. ANDERSEN, in her official capacity
Represented By: Lillian Lane Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE
Represented By: Lillian Lane Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?