Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Columbia South Carolina, City of
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD MPH |
COLUMBIA SOUTH CAROLINA, CITY OF, THE CITY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT, for damages and injunctive and declaratory relief, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages, TANDY CARTER, individually for damages, DEBBIE C. JORDAN, individually for damages, MICHAEL KING, individually for damages, CPD CAPTAIN GREGORY A. SHARP, individually for damages, CPD SARGENT JAMES AULD, individually for damages, CPD OFFICER BROWN, individually for damages, CPD OFFICER GIRARD, indivdidually for damages, RICHLAND/COLUMBIA DISPATCHER BRUNER, individually for damages, RETIRED CPD SARGENT JOSEPH SMITH, individually for damages, DANA DAVIS TURNER, individually for damages, PAMELA ELIZABETH JACOBS HAWKINS, individually for damages, ATTORNEY ROBERT G. COOPER, individually for damages, ATTORNEY DAVID FARRELL, individually for damages, DINAH GAIL STEELE, LARRY WAYNE MASON, JOHN MITCHEL JONES, CHARLENE CROUCH, TERESA FELICIA INGRAM-JACKSON, individually for damages, STEELE ENTERPRISES, corporation owned by Steele and/or Mason for damages, AAA INVESTIGATIONS, corporation owned by Steele and/or Mason for damages, J. ANDREW DELANEY, individually for damages, MCANGUS GOUDELOCK & COURIE, for damages, REUBEN SANTIAGO, Interim CPD Chief solely officially for injunctive and declaratory relief, TERESA WISLON, Manager of the City solely officially for injunctive and declaratory relief, ALAN WILSON, Attorney General of South Carolina solely officially for injunctive and declaratory relief, and other presently-unknown persons and entities who acted to injure Plaintiff on 12 December 2009 and CPD OFFICER GIRARD, individually for damages |
22-1920 |
August 31, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER filed granting Motion to consolidate case 22-1920 with 22-1917 [ # 1001236443-4 ]; granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 1001236443-3 ]. Number of days granted: 30; granting motion to file brief in the format prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28; deferring action on motion to appoint/assign counsel or argue pro se [ # 1001236443-2 ] filed by Appellant Marie Therese Assa'ad-Faltas [ # 1001236443-6 ]. Opening brief and joint appendix due 10/27/2022 [ # 1001236443-5 ]. Response brief due 11/17/2022. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. Copies to all parties. [1001237345] [22-1917, 22-1920] CP [Entered: 09/27/2022 03:39 PM] |
Filing 5 MOTION by Marie Therese Assa'ad-Faltas to appoint/assign counsel. , to consolidate case 22-1920 with 22-1917 , to extend filing time for opening brief and appendix until 26 November 2022, God so willing. , file formal brief , to obtain physical records from district court, allow pro se oral argument.. Date and method of service: 09/26/2022 ecf. [1001236444] [22-1920] Marie Assa'ad-Faltas [Entered: 09/26/2022 08:06 PM] |
Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 3:13-cv-02715-TLW. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001231114] [22-1920] CP [Entered: 09/16/2022 10:12 AM] |
Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001222959]. Due: 09/15/2022. [22-1920] CP [Entered: 09/01/2022 11:42 AM] |
Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. [1001222952] Informal Opening Brief due 09/26/2022. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-1920] CP [Entered: 09/01/2022 11:38 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:13-cv-02715-TLW. Case manager: CPoulsen. [1001222505] [22-1920] CP [Entered: 08/31/2022 04:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.