Island Creek Coal Company v. Juanita Kenneda
| ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY |
| JUANITA KENNEDA, o/b/o and Widow of GREGORY O. KENNEDA and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR |
| 22-1987 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Juanita Kenneda. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001231793] [22-1987] Brad Austin [Entered: 09/19/2022 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Brad A. Austin for Juanita Kenneda. [1001231792] [22-1987] Brad Austin [Entered: 09/19/2022 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record. Date petition for review or application filed: 09/16/2022. [ # 2 ] petition for review. Mailed to: Steven Winkelman U.S. Department of Labor Office of the Solicitor Frances Perkins Building, Room N-2119 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20210. [1001231411] Administrative Record due 10/26/2022 [22-1987] RHS [Entered: 09/16/2022 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] petition for review Originating case number: 21-0296 BLA,21-0480 BLA.. [1001231401] [22-1987] RHS [Entered: 09/16/2022 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for review of agency order filed by Island Creek Coal Company .[1001231399] [22-1987] RHS [Entered: 09/16/2022 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 21-0296 BLA,21-0480 BLA. Case manager: RSewell. [1001231378] [22-1987] RHS [Entered: 09/16/2022 02:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
