Kenneth Sanford v. City of Franklin
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENNETH L. SANFORD
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF FRANKLIN, VIRGINIA, SOUTHAMPTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR and SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Case Number: 22-2030
Filed: September 30, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2022 Filing 6 MANDATE ISSUED UPON ENTRY OF ORDER/ JUDGMENT. Referencing: [ # 5 ] Order. Originating case number: 3:21-cv-00046-MHL. Date of order/judgment: 10/06/2022. Mailed to: Kenneth L. Sanford, 301 Beale Court, Franklin, VA 23851. [1001243300] [22-2030] NRS [Entered: 10/06/2022 10:46 AM]
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER filed closing of appeal administratively. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Kenneth L. Sanford, 301 Beale Court, Franklin, VA 23851. [1001243296] [22-2030] NRS [Entered: 10/06/2022 10:45 AM]
October 3, 2022 Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 3:21-cv-00046-MHL. Record in folder or on docket? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001240683] [22-2030] NRS [Entered: 10/03/2022 01:28 PM]
September 30, 2022 Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Kenneth L. Sanford, 301 Beale Court, Franklin, VA 23851. [1001239611] Informal Opening Brief due 10/24/2022. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-2030] NRS [Entered: 09/30/2022 11:34 AM]
September 30, 2022 Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Kenneth L. Sanford - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 10/31/2022. Originating case number: 3:21-cv-00046-MHL. Mailed to: Kenneth L. Sanford, 301 Beale Court, Franklin, VA 23851. [1001239606] [22-2030] NRS [Entered: 09/30/2022 11:29 AM]
September 30, 2022 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:21-cv-00046-MHL. Case manager: NaeemahSims. [1001239582] [22-2030] NRS [Entered: 09/30/2022 11:11 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kenneth Sanford v. City of Franklin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: KENNETH L. SANFORD
Represented By: Kenneth L. Sanford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF FRANKLIN, VIRGINIA
Represented By: Lloyd Lee Byrd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SOUTHAMPTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Represented By: Hunter Dean Weikel
Represented By: Johneal M. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Represented By: Hunter Dean Weikel
Represented By: Johneal M. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?