Eastern Associated Coal Company v. Tony Setliff
Petitioner: EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL COMPANY and PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
Respondent: TONY D. SETLIFF and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Case Number: 22-2052
Filed: October 5, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2022 Filing 8 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Ann Marie Scarpino for DOWCP. [1001243335] [22-2052] Ann Scarpino [Entered: 10/06/2022 11:12 AM]
October 5, 2022 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tony D. Setliff. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001242980] [22-2052] Brad Austin [Entered: 10/05/2022 08:19 PM]
October 5, 2022 Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Brad A. Austin for Tony D. Setliff. [1001242979] [22-2052] Brad Austin [Entered: 10/05/2022 08:18 PM]
October 5, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record. Date petition for review or application filed: 10/05/2022. [ # 2 ] petition for review. [1001242924] Administrative Record due 11/14/2022. [22-2052] NRS [Entered: 10/05/2022 04:54 PM]
October 5, 2022 Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: BRB-1: 20-0463 BLA. [1001242918] [22-2052] NRS [Entered: 10/05/2022 04:48 PM]
October 5, 2022 Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Hugh Brett Stonecipher - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 10/20/2022. Originating case number: BRB-1: 20-0463 BLA. [1001242908] [22-2052] NRS [Entered: 10/05/2022 04:41 PM]
October 5, 2022 Filing 2 Petition for review of agency order filed by Eastern Associated Coal Company and Peabody Energy Corporation.[1001242906] [22-2052] NRS [Entered: 10/05/2022 04:40 PM]
October 5, 2022 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: BRB-1: 20-0463 BLA. Case manager: NaeemahSims. [1001242897] [22-2052] NRS [Entered: 10/05/2022 04:35 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Eastern Associated Coal Company v. Tony Setliff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL COMPANY
Represented By: Hugh Brett Stonecipher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
Represented By: Hugh Brett Stonecipher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TONY D. SETLIFF
Represented By: Brad Anthony Austin
Represented By: Joseph E. Wolfe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Represented By: Betty English
Represented By: Ann Marie Scarpino
Represented By: Thomas O. Shepherd Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?