Cavour Ndam v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft
Plaintiff / Appellant: CAVOUR NDAM
Defendant / Appellee: DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, a/k/a Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft Inc.
Case Number: 22-2084
Filed: October 17, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Airplane Personal Injury

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 22, 2023 Cavour Ndam v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER filed granting motion to extend filing time [ # 9 ]. Number of days granted: 14. Informal Opening Brief due 12/27/2022. Copies to all parties. [1001281296] [22-2084] TB [Entered: 12/12/2022 04:37 PM]
December 12, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION by Cavour Ndam to extend filing time for the informal brief until 12/27/2022. Date and method of service: 12/12/2022. [1001281120] [22-2084]--[Edited 12/12/2022 by CB to modify text.] Cavour Ndam [Entered: 12/12/2022 02:39 PM]
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 7 ]. Number of days granted: 30. Informal Opening Brief due 12/12/2022. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Cavour Ndam. [1001263561] [22-2084] TB [Entered: 11/09/2022 02:03 PM]
November 7, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION by Cavour Ndam to extend filing time for informal opening brief. Date and method of service: 11/04/2022 US mail. [1001263551] [22-2084] TB [Entered: 11/09/2022 01:51 PM]
November 1, 2022 Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? Yes [1001258606] [22-2084] Jonathan Stern [Entered: 11/01/2022 11:52 AM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cavour Ndam. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No. [1001258524] [22-2084] TB [Entered: 11/01/2022 11:03 AM]
October 18, 2022 Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-01258-PTG-WEF. Record in folder or on docket? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001250057] [22-2084] TB [Entered: 10/18/2022 02:21 PM]
October 17, 2022 Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001248516]. Due: 10/31/2022. [22-2084] TB [Entered: 10/17/2022 09:29 AM]
October 17, 2022 Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Cavour Ndam. [1001248505] Informal Opening Brief due 11/10/2022 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-2084] TB [Entered: 10/17/2022 09:25 AM]
October 17, 2022 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-01258-PTG-WEF. Case manager: TBarton. [1001248494] [22-2084] TB [Entered: 10/17/2022 09:22 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cavour Ndam v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CAVOUR NDAM
Represented By: Cavour Ndam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, a/k/a Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft Inc.
Represented By: Jonathan Michael Stern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?