Pearline Ruffin v. Anthem, Inc.
| PEARLINE RUFFIN |
| ANTHEM, INCORPORATED |
| 22-2102 |
| October 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 INFORMAL REPLY BRIEF by Pearline Ruffin. [1001279654] [22-2102] EB [Entered: 12/08/2022 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 13 INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by Anthem, Incorporated. [1001275464] [22-2102] David Constine [Entered: 12/01/2022 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Pearline Ruffin. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001266460] [22-2102] EB [Entered: 11/15/2022 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 11 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Pearline Ruffin. [1001266451] [22-2102] EB [Entered: 11/15/2022 04:15 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER filed denying motion to extend filing time [ # 9 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Pearline Ruffin. [1001261855] [22-2102] EB [Entered: 11/07/2022 12:34 PM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION by Anthem, Incorporated to extend filing time for informal response brief.. Date and method of service: 11/07/2022 US mail. [1001261808] [22-2102] David Constine [Entered: 11/07/2022 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by David E. Constine, III for Anthem, Incorporated. [1001261216] [22-2102] David Constine [Entered: 11/04/2022 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Anthem, Incorporated. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? Yes [1001261214] [22-2102] Andrew Henson [Entered: 11/04/2022 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Andrew J. Henson for Anthem, Incorporated. [1001261212] [22-2102] Andrew Henson [Entered: 11/04/2022 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 2:21-cv-00251-LRL. Record in folder or on docket? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001252688] [22-2102] EB [Entered: 10/21/2022 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001252447]. Due: 11/04/2022. [22-2102] EB [Entered: 10/21/2022 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Andrew Henson; Pearline Ruffin. [1001252439] Informal Opening Brief due 11/14/2022. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-2102] EB [Entered: 10/21/2022 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Pearline Ruffin - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 11/21/2022. Originating case number: 2:21-cv-00251-LRL. Mailed to: Andrew Henson; Pearline Ruffin. [1001252438] [22-2102] EB [Entered: 10/21/2022 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:21-cv-00251-LRL. Case manager: EBorneisen. [1001252430] [22-2102] EB [Entered: 10/21/2022 12:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Pearline Ruffin v. Anthem, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: PEARLINE RUFFIN | |
| Represented By: | Pearline Ruffin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ANTHEM, INCORPORATED | |
| Represented By: | David Edward Constine III |
| Represented By: | Andrew Henson |
| Represented By: | Andrew J. Henson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
