Ronald Emrit v. United States Naval Intelligence
| RONALD SATISH EMRIT |
| UNITED STATES NAVAL INTELLIGENCE, LLOYD AUSTIN, Secretary and PENTAGON/ DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE |
| 22-2149 |
| November 9, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Ronald Emrit v. United States Naval Intelligence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Ronald Satish Emrit. [1001294887] [22-2149] RP [Entered: 01/06/2023 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 CHANGE OF ADDRESS Notice by Ronald Satish Emrit. [1001294886] [22-2149] RP [Entered: 01/06/2023 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Ronald Satish Emrit re: failure to file informal brief. Mailed to: Ronald Satish Emrit. [1001280196] [22-2149] RP [Entered: 12/09/2022 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:22-cv-02821-LKG. Record in folder or on docket? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001263986] [22-2149] RP [Entered: 11/10/2022 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001263430]. Due: 11/23/2022. [22-2149] RP [Entered: 11/09/2022 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Ronald Satish Emrit. [1001263428] Informal Opening Brief due 12/05/2022. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-2149] RP [Entered: 11/09/2022 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:22-cv-02821-LKG. Case manager: RachelPhillips. [1001263424] [22-2149] RP [Entered: 11/09/2022 11:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
