Antonieta Romero-Diaz v. Merrick Garland
ANTONIETA MARTA ROMERO-DIAZ and W.A.E. |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
22-2155 |
November 10, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Antonieta Romero-Diaz v. Merrick Garland |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Elizabeth Chapman for Merrick B. Garland. [1001264491] [22-2155] Elizabeth Chapman [Entered: 11/10/2022 07:46 PM] |
Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record. Date petition for review or application filed: 11/10/2022. [ # 2 ] petition for review. Mailed to: Christopher Tenorio, Director Office of Immigration Litigation USDOJ/Civil Divison 1331 Pennsylvannia Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20004 and Michael A. Falcone, Chief Counsel US ICE US Department of Homeland Security 500 12th Street, SW, Stop 5902 Washington, DC 20546-5902. [1001264397] Administrative Record due 12/20/2022 [22-2155] RE [Entered: 11/10/2022 04:05 PM] |
Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] petition for review . Originating case number: A208-170-406,A208-170-407. [1001264394] [22-2155] RE [Entered: 11/10/2022 04:00 PM] |
Filing 2 Petition for review of agency order filed by Antonieta Marta Romero-Diaz and W.A.E. .[1001264393] [22-2155] RE [Entered: 11/10/2022 03:58 PM] |
Filing 1 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $500.00. Receipt Number: A04-73002-733. [1001264391] [22-2155] RE [Entered: 11/10/2022 03:57 PM] |
Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case number: A208-170-406,A208-170-407. Case manager: REdwards. [1001264389] [22-2155] RE [Entered: 11/10/2022 03:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.