NLRB v. Pain Relief Centers P.A.
| NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD |
| PAIN RELIEF CENTERS P.A. |
| 22-2157 |
| November 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record. Date petition for review or application filed: 11/10/2022. [ # 2 ] Motion for enforcement of agency order. Mailed to: Judith H. Holmes 6393 North Desert Wind Circle Tucson, AZ 85750, Sharese Cromer, Practice Manager Pain Relief Centers, P.A. 1224 Commerce Street SW Suite A Conover, NC 28613, Amber Whitlock 507 Crawford Road Statesville, NC 28625, Sean Marshall NLRB Suite 600 Region 5, Tower II 100 South Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21201. [1001264657] Administrative Record due 12/27/2022 [22-2157] AW [Entered: 11/14/2022 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 3 RULE 15 NOTICE ISSUED to NLRB requesting response to the [ # 2 ] Motion for enforcement of agency order. Response due 12/05/2022. Mailed to: Judith H. Holmes 6393 North Desert Wind Circle Tucson, AZ 85750, Sharese Cromer, Practice Manager Pain Relief Centers, P.A. 1224 Commerce Street SW Suite A Conover, NC 28613, Amber Whitlock 507 Crawford Road Statesville, NC 28625, Sean Marshall NLRB Suite 600 Region 5, Tower II 100 South Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21201. [1001264637] [22-2157] AW [Entered: 11/14/2022 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 10-CA-266324. Case manager: AWalker. [1001264621] [22-2157] AW [Entered: 11/14/2022 08:45 AM] |
| Filing 2 Application for enforcement of agency order filed by NLRB.[1001264628] [22-2157] AW [Entered: 11/14/2022 08:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
