In re: Stephen Nivens
| In re: STEPHEN NIVENS |
| 22-2171 |
| November 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [4]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Stephen Nivens. [1001267522] [22-2171] RE [Entered: 11/17/2022 10:07 AM]
|
| Filing 4 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Stephen Nivens. [1001267402] [22-2171] RE [Entered: 11/17/2022 09:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of habeas corpus. Mailed to: Stephen Nivens. [1001267398] [22-2171] RE [Entered: 11/17/2022 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Case manager: REdwards. [1001267392] [22-2171] RE [Entered: 11/17/2022 08:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Stephen Nivens. [1001267396] [22-2171] RE [Entered: 11/17/2022 08:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Stephen Nivens | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: STEPHEN NIVENS | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Nivens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
