Matthew Linger v. Commissioner of Social Security
| MATTHEW DANA LINGER |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| 22-2192 |
| November 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| S.S.I.D. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 10 ]. Number of days granted: 30. Opening brief and appendix due 02/16/2023. Response brief due 03/20/2023. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. Copies to all parties. [1001290792] [22-2192] NRS [Entered: 12/29/2022 04:35 PM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION by Matthew Dana Linger Dana W. Duncan, Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellant to extend filing time for opening brief and appendix until Thursday, February 16, 2023.. Date and method of service: 12/29/2022 ecf. [1001290788] [22-2192] Dana Duncan [Entered: 12/29/2022 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 9 Attorney Brian D. Bailey for Matthew Dana Linger in 22-2192, Brittany Hoover, Maximillian Fitzsimmons Nogay and Patricia Anne Stewart for Commissioner of Social Security in 22-2192 terminated from case. Reason for termination: Not participating. [1001280627] [22-2192] NRS [Entered: 12/12/2022 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 8 BRIEFING ORDER filed. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. All filings must comply with # Appendix Pagination & Brief Citation Guide . [1001276884] Opening Brief and Appendix due 01/17/2023. Response Brief due 02/16/2023. Mailed to: Brittany Hoover, Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, 300 Spring Garden Street, Philadelphia, PA 19123 and Brian D. Bailey, BAILEY, STULTZ, OLDAKER & GREENE, PLLC, 122 Court Avenue, P. O. Drawer 1310, Weston, WV 26452-0000. [22-2192] NRS [Entered: 12/05/2022 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD in electronic format by Commissioner of Social Security. Method of service: ECF service on counsel. [1001276807] [22-2192] Maximillian Nogay [Entered: 12/05/2022 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by David E. Somers, III for Commissioner of Social Security. [1001271359] [22-2192] David Somers [Entered: 11/23/2022 08:24 AM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Matthew Dana Linger. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001269439] [22-2192] Dana Duncan [Entered: 11/21/2022 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 4 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Matthew Dana Linger.. [1001269433] [22-2192] Dana Duncan [Entered: 11/21/2022 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Dana W. Duncan for Matthew Dana Linger. [1001269409] [22-2192] Dana Duncan [Entered: 11/21/2022 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD requested (counseled cases) . Was administrative record filed in electronic form in district court? Yes. [1001269142] Administrative Record (Social Security) due 12/05/2022. [22-2192] NRS [Entered: 11/21/2022 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1001269100-2 ] social security case. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-00102-TSK-RWT. Mailed to: Brittany Hoover, Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, 300 Spring Garden Street, Philadelphia, PA 19123 and Brian D. Bailey, BAILEY, STULTZ, OLDAKER & GREENE, PLLC, 122 Court Avenue, P. O. Drawer 1310, Weston, WV 26452-0000. [1001269135] [22-2192] NRS [Entered: 11/21/2022 09:50 AM] |
| Social Security case docketed. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-00102-TSK-RWT. Date notice of appeal filed: 11/17/2022. Case manager: NaeemahSims. [1001269100] [22-2192] NRS [Entered: 11/21/2022 09:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
