Helene McCarthy-Staples v. M. Brickhouse
| HELENE MCCARTHY-STAPLES |
| M. BRADLEY BRICKHOUSE, COLLEEN T. DICKERSON, FRANK J. DRISCOLL, JR., LISA A. BROCCOLETTI, MARLANDE SLEDGE, SUSANNE FERRANTELLI, PAMELA JACK, ALICIA R. WELLONS, TABETHA L. TURNER, CHRISTIANNA RUTH DOUGHERTY-CUNNINGHAM and MARK DOUGLAS STILES |
| 22-2257 |
| December 8, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Helene McCarthy-Staples v. M. Brickhouse |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Helene McCarthy-Staples. [1001286955] [22-2257] NRS [Entered: 12/20/2022 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 2:21-cv-00383-EWH-RJK. Record in folder or on docket? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001279555] [22-2257] NRS [Entered: 12/08/2022 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001279380]. Due: 12/22/2022. [22-2257] NRS [Entered: 12/08/2022 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Helene McCarthy-Staples, Apt. 2415, 400 South Military Highway, Virginia Beach, VA 23464. [1001279375] Informal Opening Brief due 01/03/2023. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-2257] NRS [Entered: 12/08/2022 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:21-cv-00383-EWH-RJK. Case manager: NaeemahSims. [1001279372] [22-2257] NRS [Entered: 12/08/2022 10:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
