In re: Kenneth Artis
Petitioner: In re: KENNETH FUQUAN ARTIS
Case Number: 22-230
Filed: July 21, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2022 Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for authorization to file successive habeas application (Local Rule 22(d)). Originating case number: 4:11-cr-00050-M-1. Mailed to: Kenneth Artis, Amy Okereke. [1001198240] [22-230] CH [Entered: 07/21/2022 04:21 PM]
July 21, 2022 Filing 2 Motion for authorization to file successive application for post-conviction relief (Local Rule 22(d)) filed by Kenneth Fuquan Artis. Are PSR & SOR available on district court docket? N. Has sentencing transcript been prepared? N. [1001198236] [22-230] CH [Entered: 07/21/2022 04:19 PM]
July 21, 2022 Filing 1 2244 case docketed. Originating case number: 4:11-cr-00050-M-1. Case manager: CHalupa. [1001198212] [22-230] CH [Entered: 07/21/2022 04:06 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Kenneth Artis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: KENNETH FUQUAN ARTIS
Represented By: Kenneth Fuquan Artis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?