In re: Perry Reese, III
In re: PERRY REESE, III |
22-310 |
November 8, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [1] 2244 case. Originating case number: 7:08-cr-00034-FL-1. Mailed to: Perry Reese. [1001262927] [22-310] RP [Entered: 11/08/2022 03:06 PM] |
Filing 3 PARTIAL RECORD requested from Clerk of Court for Presentence Investigation Report and Statement of Reasons. [1001262923] Due: 11/14/2022 [22-310] RP [Entered: 11/08/2022 03:04 PM] |
Filing 2 Motion for authorization to file successive application for post-conviction relief (Local Rule 22(d)) filed by Perry Reese, III. Are PSR & SOR available on district court docket? Y. Has sentencing transcript been prepared? Y. [1001262917] [22-310] RP [Entered: 11/08/2022 03:01 PM] |
Filing 1 2244 case docketed. Originating case number: 7:08-cr-00034-FL-1. Case manager: RachelPhillips. [1001262890] [22-310] RP [Entered: 11/08/2022 02:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Perry Reese, III | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: PERRY REESE, III | |
Represented By: | Perry Reese III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.