US v. William Bailey
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
WILLIAM THOMAS BAILEY |
22-4524 |
September 13, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER filed appointing/assigning counsel. Daniel Baker McIntyre III for William Thomas Bailey in 22-4524. Nunc pro Tunc Date: 09/14/2022. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Appellant's address is unavailable. [1001230137] [22-4524] LRM [Entered: 09/14/2022 03:32 PM] |
Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Originating case number: 4:20-cr-00056-BO-1. Date notice of appeal filed: 09/09/2022. Case manager: TBarton. [1001228933] [22-4524] TB [Entered: 09/13/2022 10:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: US v. William Bailey | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | David A. Bragdon |
Represented By: | Charity Lynn Wilson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: WILLIAM THOMAS BAILEY | |
Represented By: | Daniel Baker McIntyre III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.