Eric Poole v. Ronald Weber
ERIC VON POOLE |
WARDEN RONALD S. WEBER, ASSISTANT WARDEN BRADLEY BUTLER, CHIEF OF SECURITY J. L. HARBAUGH, LT. WAGNER and OFFICER REYES |
22-6073 |
January 21, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-01594-GLR. Mailed to: Poole. [1001113545] [22-6073] AW [Entered: 02/18/2022 03:36 PM] |
Filing 6 ORDER filed granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [ # 5 ][6] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Poole. [1001113539] [22-6073] AW [Entered: 02/18/2022 03:33 PM] |
Filing 5 MOTION by Eric Von Poole to voluntarily dismiss appeal pursuant to Rule 42(b). [1001113534] [22-6073] AW [Entered: 02/18/2022 03:30 PM] |
Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-01594-GLR. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001096033] [22-6073] AW [Entered: 01/21/2022 11:36 AM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Eric Von Poole. [1001096024] Informal Opening Brief due 02/14/2022 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-6073] AW [Entered: 01/21/2022 11:32 AM] |
Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Eric Von Poole ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Eric Von Poole. [1001096022] [22-6073] AW [Entered: 01/21/2022 11:31 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-01594-GLR. Case manager: AWalker. [1001096004] [22-6073] AW [Entered: 01/21/2022 11:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.