Carnell McElroy v. Harold Clarke
| CARNELL DION MCELROY, SR. |
| HAROLD CLARKE, Director of D.O.C., GREGORY L. HOLLOWAY, WARDEN KAISER, I.M.P. BAKER, I.M.P. SYKES and C. CAUTHORNE |
| 22-6080 |
| January 24, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr. re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Complete PLRA documents due 04/04/2022. Mailed to: Carnell McElroy. [1001130533] [22-6080] RJL [Entered: 03/18/2022 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 13 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr.. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: No. [1001130531] [22-6080] RJL [Entered: 03/18/2022 01:19 PM] |
Filing 12
ORDER filed deferring action on Motion to appoint/assign counsel filed by Appellant Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr. [ # 11 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Carnell McElroy. [1001130528] [22-6080] RJL [Entered: 03/18/2022 01:17 PM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION by Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr. to appoint/assign counsel. Date and method of service: 03/18/2022 US mail. [1001130526] [22-6080] RJL [Entered: 03/18/2022 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 10 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr.. [1001130523] [22-6080] RJL [Entered: 03/18/2022 01:15 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER filed deferring action on Motion to appoint/assign counsel filed by Appellant Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr. [ # 8 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Carnell McElroy. [1001116741] [22-6080] RJL [Entered: 02/24/2022 03:27 PM]
|
| Filing 8 MOTION by Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr. to appoint/assign counsel. Date and method of service: 02/24/2022 US mail. [1001116740] [22-6080] RJL [Entered: 02/24/2022 03:26 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 6 ]. Number of days granted: 30. Informal Opening Brief and PLRA documents due 03/21/2022. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Carnell McElroy. [1001116720] [22-6080] RJL [Entered: 02/24/2022 03:16 PM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION by Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr. to extend filing time for informal opening brief and PLRA documents for 30 days. Date and method of service: 02/24/2022 US mail. [1001116716] [22-6080] RJL [Entered: 02/24/2022 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr. re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Informal Opening Brief and PLRA documents due 03/11/2022. Mailed to: Carnell McElroy. [1001116337] [22-6080] RJL [Entered: 02/24/2022 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 7:21-cv-00091-JPJ-PMS. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001097256] [22-6080] RJL [Entered: 01/24/2022 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Carnell McElroy. [1001097253] Informal Opening Brief due 02/17/2022 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-6080] RJL [Entered: 01/24/2022 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr. ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Fee or PLRA doucments due 02/08/2022. Mailed to: Carnell McElroy. [1001097251] [22-6080] RJL [Entered: 01/24/2022 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:21-cv-00091-JPJ-PMS. Case manager: RachelLee. [1001097246] [22-6080] RJL [Entered: 01/24/2022 02:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
