David Meyers v. A. Miller
| DAVID MEYERS |
| A. MILLER, Mail Clerk of Sussex I State Prison, CITY OF WAVERLY, VIRGINIA, IVAN GILMORE, Chief Warden and EUGENE MURPHY, Chief Warden |
| 22-6110 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to David Meyers re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Meyers. [1001139022] [22-6110] DL [Entered: 04/01/2022 12:22 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER filed extendinging plra fee requirement deadlines. PLRA documents due 03/21/2022. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Meyers. [1001115579] [22-6110] TF [Entered: 02/23/2022 01:07 PM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by David Meyers in 22-1095, 22-6110 to place case in abeyance. [1001111496] [22-1095, 22-6110] TF [Entered: 02/16/2022 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ David Meyers ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Meyers. [1001102886] [22-6110] TF [Entered: 02/02/2022 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 2:20-cv-00467-RAJ-LRL. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001102885] [22-6110] TF [Entered: 02/02/2022 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:20-cv-00467-RAJ-LRL. Case manager: TFischer. [1001102879] [22-6110] TF [Entered: 02/02/2022 11:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
