Antonio Patterson v. State of South Carolina
ANTONIO DIEARGO PATTERSON |
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and SHERIFF KRISTIN GRAZIANO |
22-6287 |
March 11, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Antonio Patterson v. State of South Carolina |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Antonio Dieargo Patterson. [1001150677] [22-6287] NRS [Entered: 04/22/2022 03:23 PM] |
Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Antonio Dieargo Patterson. [1001150148] [22-6287] NRS [Entered: 04/21/2022 04:31 PM] |
Filing 4 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Antonio Dieargo Patterson re: failure to file preliminary informal brief. Mailed to: Antonio Dieargo Patterson SHERIFF AL CANNON DETENTION CENTER 3841 Leeds Avenue North Charleston, SC 29405. [1001143262] [22-6287] NRS [Entered: 04/11/2022 10:12 AM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Antonio Dieargo Patterson SHERIFF AL CANNON DETENTION CENTER 3841 Leeds Avenue North Charleston, SC 29405. [1001126563] Informal Opening Brief due 04/07/2022. [22-6287] AB [Entered: 03/14/2022 07:41 AM] |
Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 8:22-cv-00411-RMG. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case? N/A. [1001126512] [22-6287] AB [Entered: 03/11/2022 07:41 PM] |
Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 8:22-cv-00411-RMG. Date notice of appeal filed: 03/10/2022. Case manager: ABrownlee. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [1001126511] [22-6287] AB [Entered: 03/11/2022 07:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.