US v. Nathaniel Williams
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
NATHANIEL WILLIAMS |
22-6464 |
April 20, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER filed sealing joint appendix volume number II. Copies to all parties. [1001167739] [22-6464] AW [Entered: 05/25/2022 08:58 AM] |
Filing 19 BRIEF by Nathaniel Williams. Type of Brief: OPENING. [1001167679] [22-6464] Jennifer Leisten [Entered: 05/24/2022 07:11 PM] |
Filing 18 SEALED JOINT APPENDIX VOLUME(S) (court access) by Nathaniel Williams . Digital media exhibit volume? No. Filed Ex parte: N. [1001167678] [22-6464] Jennifer Leisten [Entered: 05/24/2022 07:08 PM] |
Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF CONFIDENTIALITY (Local Rule 25(c)) by Nathaniel Williams. Sealing Required: Yes. Description of document referenced by certificate: Volume II of Joint Appendix. [1001167677] [22-6464] Jennifer Leisten [Entered: 05/24/2022 07:05 PM] |
Filing 16 JOINT APPENDIX by Nathaniel Williams. Digital media exhibit volume? No. [1001167676] [22-6464] Jennifer Leisten [Entered: 05/24/2022 07:02 PM] |
Filing 15 ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 14 ] Number of days granted: 7. Opening brief and appendix due 05/24/2022. Response brief due 06/23/2022. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1001162817] [22-6464] AW [Entered: 05/16/2022 12:30 PM] |
Filing 14 MOTION by Nathaniel Williams to extend filing time for opening brief and appendix until May 24. 2022.. Date and method of service: 05/16/2022 ecf. [1001162663] [22-6464] Jennifer Leisten [Entered: 05/16/2022 10:31 AM] |
Filing 13 ACCELERATED BRIEFING ORDER filed. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. [1001160194] Opening Brief and Appendix due 05/17/2022. Response Brief due 06/16/2022 [22-6464] AW [Entered: 05/10/2022 03:48 PM] |
Filing 12 ORDER filed granting Motion to accelerate case processing [ # 7 ]; deferring action on Motion to expedite decision filed by Appellant Nathaniel Williams [ # 7 ]. Is oral argument requested: Yes. Copies to all parties. [1001154210] [22-6464] AW [Entered: 04/28/2022 04:46 PM] |
Filing 11 REPLY by Nathaniel Williams to response [ # 10 ].. [1001154192] [22-6464] Jennifer Leisten [Entered: 04/28/2022 04:33 PM] |
Filing 10 RESPONSE/ANSWER by US to notice requesting response [ # 9 ], Motion to accelerate case processing [ # 7 ], Motion to expedite decision [ # 7 ]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001153873] [22-6464] Genna Petre [Entered: 04/28/2022 12:04 PM] |
Filing 9 NOTICE ISSUED to US requesting response to Motion to accelerate case processing [ # 7 ], Motion to expedite decision [ # 7 ]Response due: 04/28/2022 by 3pm.[1001153404]. [22-6464] AW [Entered: 04/27/2022 04:35 PM] |
Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ORDER ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed for Amy Condon. Identify by proceeding and date all transcript ordered from this court reporter: Commitment hearing- 04/11/2022-04/12/2022. Names of all parties ordering transcript from this reporter: Nathaniel Williams. Originating case number: 5:21-hc-02244-BR. [1001153331] Transcript due from Amy Condon, Official Court Reporter on 07/05/2022. [22-6464] AW [Entered: 04/27/2022 03:56 PM] |
Filing 7 MOTION by Nathaniel Williams to accelerate case processing. , to expedite decision. Date and method of service: 04/27/2022 ecf. [1001153325] [22-6464] Jennifer Leisten [Entered: 04/27/2022 03:49 PM] |
Filing 6 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Nathaniel Williams.. [1001153265] [22-6464] Jennifer Leisten [Entered: 04/27/2022 03:24 PM] |
Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Jennifer C. Leisten for Nathaniel Williams. [1001153258] [22-6464] Jennifer Leisten [Entered: 04/27/2022 03:22 PM] |
Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Genna D. Petre for US. [1001153084] [22-6464] Genna Petre [Entered: 04/27/2022 12:26 PM] |
Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 5:21-hc-02244-BR.. [1001149135] [22-6464] AW [Entered: 04/20/2022 12:27 PM] |
Filing 2 ORDER filed appointing the Federal Public Defender for Nathaniel Williams in 22-6464. Copies to all parties. [1001149131] [22-6464] AW [Entered: 04/20/2022 12:25 PM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:21-hc-02244-BR. Case manager: AWalker. [1001149118] [22-6464] AW [Entered: 04/20/2022 12:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: US v. Nathaniel Williams | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Genna Danelle Petre |
Represented By: | Mallory Brooks Storus |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: NATHANIEL WILLIAMS | |
Represented By: | Sonya Maria Allen |
Represented By: | G. Alan DuBois |
Represented By: | Jennifer Claire Leisten |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.