David Meyers v. Chief U.S. District Judge
DAVID MEYERS |
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE, OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT GREENSBORO NC DIVISION, U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALL ELEVEN U. S. ATTORNEY GENERALS, THAT IS THE 11 DEPUTY U.S. ATTORNEY GENERALS, THE DIRECTOR OF THE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIT, DIRECTOR OF THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, SOLICITOR GENERAL OF THE U.S., JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, U. S. NATIONAL PREA COMMISSION, UNITED STATES PREA REVIEW PANEL, DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and U. S. ATTORNEY |
22-6604 |
May 24, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to David Meyers re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001179068] [22-6604] RHS [Entered: 06/16/2022 12:56 PM] |
Filing 3 DOCUMENT - Consolidated Motion for Relief to Reopen All Below Cases and for the Court to Vacate All Below Dismissal Orders and Grant Me Relief by David Meyers. [1001179061] [22-6604] RHS [Entered: 06/16/2022 12:50 PM] |
Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ David Meyers ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001166936] [22-6604] RHS [Entered: 05/24/2022 09:33 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:22-cv-00132-MOC-DCK. Case manager: RSewell. [1001166906] [22-6604] RHS [Entered: 05/24/2022 09:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.