US v. James Parrish, Jr.
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JAMES JACOB PARRISH, JR. |
| 22-6684 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Returned mail received from James Jacob Parrish, Jr. What action was taken to correct address and re-serve document? None, address verified with locater system and is correct. Items were also received and case is in OSC at this time. [1001209790] [22-6684] NRS [Entered: 08/10/2022 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 9 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by James Jacob Parrish, Jr. [1001208438] [22-6684] NRS [Entered: 08/09/2022 09:58 AM] |
Filing 8
ORDER filed granting motion to extend filing time [ # 7 ]. Number of days granted: 14. Informal Opening Brief due 08/10/2022. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: ames Jacob Parrish Jr., FCI BEAUMONT MEDIUM, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, P. O. Box 26040, Beaumont, TX 77720-0000. [1001201561] [22-6684] NRS [Entered: 07/27/2022 03:07 PM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION by James Jacob Parrish, Jr. to extend filing time for informal opening brief. Date and method of service: 07/22/2022 US mail. [1001201555] [22-6684] NRS [Entered: 07/27/2022 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to James Jacob Parrish, Jr. re: failure to file informal brief. Mailed to: James Jacob Parrish Jr., FCI BEAUMONT MEDIUM, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, P. O. Box 26040, Beaumont, TX 77720-0000. [1001192218] [22-6684] NRS [Entered: 07/12/2022 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Stacey D. Haynes for US. [1001180774] [22-6684] Stacey Haynes [Entered: 06/21/2022 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 3:17-cr-00347-TLW-1,3:20-cv-03607-TLW. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? Yes. [1001178128] [22-6684] NRS [Entered: 06/15/2022 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001176537]. Due: 06/27/2022. [22-6684] NRS [Entered: 06/13/2022 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: James Jacob Parrish Jr., FCI BEAUMONT MEDIUM, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, P. O. Box 26040, Beaumont, TX 77720-0000. [1001176525] Informal Opening Brief due 07/07/2022. [22-6684] NRS [Entered: 06/13/2022 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 1 2255 case docketed. Originating case number: 3:17-cr-00347-TLW-1,3:20-cv-03607-TLW. Date notice of appeal filed: 05/26/2022. Case manager: NaeemahSims. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [1001176507] [22-6684] NRS [Entered: 06/13/2022 10:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. James Parrish, Jr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Stacey Denise Haynes |
| Represented By: | Carrie Fisher Sherard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: JAMES JACOB PARRISH, JR. | |
| Represented By: | James Jacob Parrish Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
