Douglas Larcomb v. J. Smith, III
Petitioner / Appellant: DOUGLAS LARCOMB
Respondent / Appellee: J. CHARLES SMITH, III, FREDERICK COUNTY, MARYLAND, STATE OF MARYLAND and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 22-6753
Filed: July 1, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 27, 2022 Douglas Larcomb v. J. Smith, III

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2022 Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Douglas Larcomb. [1001199462] [22-6753] AW [Entered: 07/25/2022 10:56 AM]
July 7, 2022 Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. State court record (paper) requested? N/A. [1001189597] [22-6753] AW [Entered: 07/07/2022 10:10 AM]
July 7, 2022 Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-02392-GLR. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case? N/A. [1001189595] [22-6753] AW [Entered: 07/07/2022 10:09 AM]
July 1, 2022 Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001187368]. Due: 07/15/2022. [22-6753] AW [Entered: 07/01/2022 03:41 PM]
July 1, 2022 Filing 2 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Larcomb. [1001187345] Informal Opening Brief due 07/25/2022 [22-6753] AW [Entered: 07/01/2022 03:29 PM]
July 1, 2022 Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-02392-GLR. Date notice of appeal filed: 06/30/2022. Case manager: AWalker. Did district court rule on COA? No. [1001187342] [22-6753] AW [Entered: 07/01/2022 03:27 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Douglas Larcomb v. J. Smith, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: DOUGLAS LARCOMB
Represented By: Douglas Larcomb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: J. CHARLES SMITH, III
Represented By: Andrew John DiMiceli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: FREDERICK COUNTY, MARYLAND
Represented By: Andrew John DiMiceli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: STATE OF MARYLAND
Represented By: Andrew John DiMiceli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Andrew John DiMiceli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?