Ernest Clark v. Warden D. Leu
Petitioner / Appellant: ERNEST FRANKLIN CLARK
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN D. LEU
Case Number: 22-6846
Filed: July 26, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 21, 2023 Ernest Clark v. Warden D. Leu

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [11] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Ernest Clark. [1001221684] [22-6846] KH [Entered: 08/30/2022 05:16 PM]
August 29, 2022 Filing 11 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Ernest Franklin Clark. [1001221682] [22-6846] KH [Entered: 08/30/2022 05:14 PM]
August 29, 2022 Filing 10 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Ernest Franklin Clark re: failure to satisfy fee requirements. Mailed to: Ernest Clark. [1001219979] [22-6846] KH [Entered: 08/29/2022 10:31 AM]
August 25, 2022 Filing 9 INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by D. Leu. [1001218285] [22-6846] Rudy Renfer [Entered: 08/25/2022 11:43 AM]
August 25, 2022 Filing 8 Corrected APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Rudy E. Renfer for D. Leu. [1001218275] [22-6846] Rudy Renfer [Entered: 08/25/2022 11:40 AM]
August 25, 2022 Filing 7 (ENTRY RESTRICTED) INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by D. Leu. [1001218249] [22-6846]--[Edited 08/25/2022 by KH - Incorrect event used. See ECF 8] Rudy Renfer [Entered: 08/25/2022 11:22 AM]
August 12, 2022 Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Ernest Franklin Clark. [1001212837] [22-6846] KH [Entered: 08/16/2022 11:38 AM]
August 11, 2022 Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:21-hc-02099-D. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001210657] [22-6846] KH [Entered: 08/11/2022 06:08 PM]
July 26, 2022 Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001200564]. Due: 08/09/2022. [22-6846] KH [Entered: 07/26/2022 01:47 PM]
July 26, 2022 Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Ernest Clark. [1001200559] Informal Opening Brief due 08/19/2022. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-6846] KH [Entered: 07/26/2022 01:42 PM]
July 26, 2022 Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Ernest Franklin Clark - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 08/25/2022. Originating case number: 5:21-hc-02099-D. Mailed to: Ernest Clark. [1001200556] [22-6846] KH [Entered: 07/26/2022 01:38 PM]
July 26, 2022 Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 5:21-hc-02099-D. Date notice of appeal filed: 07/26/2022. Case manager: KHancock. Did district court rule on COA? N/A. [1001200547] [22-6846] KH [Entered: 07/26/2022 01:32 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ernest Clark v. Warden D. Leu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ERNEST FRANKLIN CLARK
Represented By: Ernest Franklin Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: WARDEN D. LEU
Represented By: Dennis Duffy
Represented By: Rudy E. Renfer
Represented By: Michael F. Easley Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?