Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Governor
| (CHIEF) MICHAEL S. GORBEY |
| GOVENOR, for the State of West Virginia and U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-6873 |
| August 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Local Rule 45 mandate issued. Originating case number: 5:22-cv-00179. Mailed to: Michael Gorbey. [1001235273] [22-6873] CH [Entered: 09/23/2022 01:36 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER filed dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Michael Gorbey. [1001235272] [22-6873] CH [Entered: 09/23/2022 01:35 PM]
|
| Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Michael S. Gorbey re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Michael S. Gorbey. [1001213821] [22-6873] CH [Entered: 08/17/2022 02:24 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER filed denying Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [3]. Mailed to Michael S. Gorbey. Copies to all parties.[1001213809] [22-6873] CH [Entered: 08/17/2022 02:12 PM]
|
| Filing 3 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Michael S. Gorbey. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: No. [1001213146] [22-6873] CH [Entered: 08/16/2022 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Michael S. Gorbey ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Michael S. Gorbey. [1001204971] [22-6873] CH [Entered: 08/02/2022 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:22-cv-00179. Case manager: CHalupa. [1001204964] [22-6873] CH [Entered: 08/02/2022 02:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
