Sequoia McKinnon v. Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Petitioner / Appellant: SEQUOIA MCKINNON
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Case Number: 22-6915
Filed: August 12, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 22, 2023 Sequoia McKinnon v. Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2022 Filing 10 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 8:22-cv-01205-RMG. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case? N/A. [1001230682] [22-6915] JSN [Entered: 09/15/2022 01:27 PM]
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 7 ]. Number of days granted: 30. Informal Opening Brief due 10/11/2022. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Sequoia McKinnon. [1001226036] [22-6915] JSN [Entered: 09/07/2022 04:18 PM]
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER filed deferring action on Motion to intervene filed by Appellant Sequoia McKinnon [ # 6 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Sequoia McKinnon. [1001226023] [22-6915] JSN [Entered: 09/07/2022 04:14 PM]
September 2, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION by Sequoia McKinnon to extend filing time for informal opening brief. Date and method of service: 08/27/2022 US mail. [1001225982] [22-6915] JSN [Entered: 09/07/2022 03:56 PM]
September 2, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION to intervene. Date and method of service: 08/27/2022 US mail. [1001225981] [22-6915] JSN [Entered: 09/07/2022 03:55 PM]
August 30, 2022 Filing 5 RECORD FOLLOW UP NOTICE ISSUED to Clerk of Court. [1001221198] Due: 09/13/2022. [22-6915] JSN [Entered: 08/30/2022 12:32 PM]
August 15, 2022 Filing 4 RECORD FOLLOW UP NOTICE ISSUED to Clerk of Court. [1001211797] Due: 08/29/2022. [22-6915] JSN [Entered: 08/15/2022 11:25 AM]
August 15, 2022 Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. [1001211790] Informal Opening Brief due 09/08/2022. Mailed to: Sequoia McKinnon. [22-6915] JSN [Entered: 08/15/2022 11:20 AM]
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER filed remanding case for limited purpose [4cca retains jurisdiction]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Sequoia McKinnon. [1001211084] [22-6915] JSN [Entered: 08/12/2022 11:59 AM]
August 12, 2022 Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 8:22-cv-01205-RMG. Date notice of appeal filed: 08/10/2022. Case manager: JeffNeal. Did district court rule on COA? No. [1001211038] [22-6915] JSN [Entered: 08/12/2022 11:26 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sequoia McKinnon v. Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: SEQUOIA MCKINNON
Represented By: Sequoia McKinnon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: WARDEN KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?