Keith Smyth v. Bryan Stirling
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEITH ADGER SMYTH
Defendant / Appellee: BRIAN STIRLING, Director, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director and CHELSEA JOHNSON, Program Manager, I.C.S.
Case Number: 22-7046
Filed: September 9, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2022 Filing 16 INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by Chelsea Johnson and Bryan P. Stirling. [1001262229] [22-7046] Anthony Ibarra [Entered: 11/07/2022 05:58 PM]
October 25, 2022 Filing 15 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Keith Adger Smyth re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Keith Adger Smyth. [1001254211] [22-7046] RP [Entered: 10/25/2022 12:22 PM]
October 24, 2022 Filing 14 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Keith Adger Smyth. Consent to Payment Form: No; Trust Account Statement: Yes. [1001253573] [22-7046] RP [Entered: 10/24/2022 04:50 PM]
October 24, 2022 Filing 13 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Keith Adger Smyth. [1001253568] [22-7046] RP [Entered: 10/24/2022 04:49 PM]
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 11 ] Number of days granted: 30. Informal Opening Brief due and PLRA documents due 11/23/2022. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Keith Adger Smyth. [1001250803] [22-7046] RP [Entered: 10/19/2022 11:44 AM]
October 18, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION by Keith Adger Smyth to extend filing time for informal opening brief by 30 days. Date and method of service: 10/18/2022 US mail. [1001250712] [22-7046] RP [Entered: 10/19/2022 11:03 AM]
October 7, 2022 Filing 10 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Keith Adger Smyth re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Fee or PLRA documents and informal brief due 10/24/22. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Keith Smyth. [1001243850] [22-7046] RP [Entered: 10/07/2022 09:18 AM]
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER filed rescinding Rule 45 Notice. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Keith Smyth. [1001239485] [22-7046] RP [Entered: 09/30/2022 10:23 AM]
September 30, 2022 Filing 8 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Keith Adger Smyth re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Fee or PLRA documents and informal opening brief due 10/17/2022. Mailed to: Keith Adger Smyth. [1001239475] [22-7046] RP [Entered: 09/30/2022 10:17 AM]
September 9, 2022 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Chelsea Johnson and Bryan P. Stirling. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001227370] [22-7046] Anthony Ibarra [Entered: 09/09/2022 01:19 PM]
September 9, 2022 Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Anthony Martin Ibarra for Bryan P. Stirling, Brian Stirling and Chelsea Johnson. [1001227369] [22-7046] Anthony Ibarra [Entered: 09/09/2022 01:18 PM]
September 9, 2022 Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Janet Brooks Holmes for Chelsea Johnson, Bryan P. Stirling and Brian Stirling. [1001227308] [22-7046] Janet Holmes [Entered: 09/09/2022 12:23 PM]
September 9, 2022 Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 0:21-cv-00649-RBH. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001227205] [22-7046] RP [Entered: 09/09/2022 10:46 AM]
September 9, 2022 Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Keith Smyth. [1001227202] Informal Opening Brief due 10/03/2022. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-7046] RP [Entered: 09/09/2022 10:42 AM]
September 9, 2022 Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Keith A. Smyth ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Fee or PLRA documents due 09/26/2022. Mailed to: Keith Smyth. [1001227199] [22-7046] RP [Entered: 09/09/2022 10:41 AM]
September 9, 2022 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 0:21-cv-00649-RBH. Case manager: RachelLee. [1001227196] [22-7046] RP [Entered: 09/09/2022 10:38 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Keith Smyth v. Bryan Stirling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: KEITH ADGER SMYTH
Represented By: Keith Adger Smyth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BRIAN STIRLING, Director
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director
Represented By: Janet Brooks Holmes
Represented By: Anthony Martin Ibarra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHELSEA JOHNSON, Program Manager, I.C.S.
Represented By: Janet Brooks Holmes
Represented By: Anthony Martin Ibarra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?