Theodore Bolick v. Bryan Stirling
| THEODORE JERRY BOLICK |
| BRYAN P. STIRLING, TERRIE WALLACE, LIEUTENANT SUMTER, LIEUTENANT WRIGHT, LIEUTENANT ROBB, GREGORY FORNESS, KIRKLAND MEDICAL STAFF, OLUWAKEMI BABATUNDE, CATHY GRIMES and JOYALYN ESKEW |
| 22-7050 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Theodore Bolick v. Bryan Stirling |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Theodore Jerry Bolick, #384070, EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 610 Highway 9 West, Bennettsville, SC 29512-5202. [1001228026] Informal Opening Brief due 10/06/2022. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-7050] KS [Entered: 09/12/2022 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Theodore Jerry Bolick ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Theodore Jerry Bolick, #384070, EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 610 Highway 9 West, Bennettsville, SC 29512-5202. [1001228024] [22-7050] KS [Entered: 09/12/2022 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:21-cv-03800-RBH-KDW. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001227974] [22-7050] KS [Entered: 09/12/2022 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:21-cv-03800-RBH-KDW. Case manager: KStump. [1001227947] [22-7050] KS [Entered: 09/12/2022 09:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
