US v. James Brooks
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JAMES CALVIN BROOKS |
| 22-7062 |
| September 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] First Step Act case. Originating case number: 2:17-cr-00004-D-1. Mailed to James Calvin Brooks. [1001229799] [22-7062] TB [Entered: 09/14/2022 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:17-cr-00004-D-1. Case manager: TBarton. Date notice of appeal filed: 09/12/2022. [1001229793] [22-7062] TB [Entered: 09/14/2022 10:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. James Brooks | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | David A. Bragdon |
| Represented By: | Sharon Coull Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: JAMES CALVIN BROOKS | |
| Represented By: | James Calvin Brooks |
| Represented By: | Richard Croutharmel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
