US v. Gabriel Lewis
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| GABRIEL OSHEL LEWIS |
| 22-7120 |
| September 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT ORDER ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed for Michelle A. McGirr. Identify by proceeding and date all transcript ordered from this court reporter: Motions Hearing - 08/24/2022. Names of all parties ordering transcript from this reporter: Gabriel Lewis. Originating case number: 5:16-hc-02209-BO. [1001249630] Transcript due from Michelle A. McGirr, Official Court Reporter on 12/27/2022. [22-7120] AW [Entered: 10/18/2022 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Genna D. Petre for US. [1001249385] [22-7120] Genna Petre [Entered: 10/18/2022 07:09 AM] |
| Filing 5 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Gabriel Oshel Lewis.. [1001249206] [22-7120] Eric Brignac [Entered: 10/17/2022 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Eric J. Brignac for Gabriel Oshel Lewis. [1001249202] [22-7120] Eric Brignac [Entered: 10/17/2022 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 5:16-hc-02209-BO. [1001237914] [22-7120] AW [Entered: 09/28/2022 12:09 PM] |
Filing 2
ORDER filed appointing the Federal Public Defender for Gabriel Oshel Lewis in 22-7120. Copies to all parties. [1001237913] [22-7120] AW [Entered: 09/28/2022 12:07 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:16-hc-02209-BO. Case manager: AWalker. [1001237787] [22-7120] AW [Entered: 09/28/2022 10:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
