Kevin Williams v. Lynn Kelly
| KEVIN KUNLAY WILLIAMS |
| LYNN B. KELLY, Butner 2 FCI Warden and LIEUTENANT LIPSCOMB |
| 22-7258 |
| October 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Kevin Kunlay Williams re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Fee or PLRA documents and informal opening brief due 12/15/2022. Mailed to: Kevin Kunlay Williams. [1001274247] [22-7258] RP [Entered: 11/30/2022 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:22-ct-03209-M. Record in folder or on docket? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001256926] [22-7258] RP [Entered: 10/28/2022 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001256648]. Due: 11/14/2022. [22-7258] RP [Entered: 10/28/2022 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Kevin Kunlay Williams. [1001256645] Informal Opening Brief due 11/21/2022. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-7258] RP [Entered: 10/28/2022 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Kevin Kunlay Williams ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Fee or PLRA documents due 11/14/2022. Mailed to: Kevin Kunlay Williams. [1001256642] [22-7258] RP [Entered: 10/28/2022 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:22-ct-03209-M. Case manager: RachelPhillips. [1001256635] [22-7258] RP [Entered: 10/28/2022 12:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
