Emmanuel McGriff El v. Centralize Infraction Bureau
| EMMANUEL LEE MCGRIFF EL |
| CENTRALIZE INFRACTION BUREAU, NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, DEPUTY A. COX, SERGEANT M. BLEYER, DEPUTY J. LEGG, DEPUTY T. SMITH, DEPUTY T. GRAY, DEPUTY P. DURHAM, GASTON LOPEZ, OFFICER C. WIGGINS, OFFICER T. ALBAUGH, OFFICER M. PARKS, OFFICER A. GUSTAVSON, OFFICER A. BRODEN, OFFICER A. KEEFER, OFFICER S. BOSTIC, OFFICER JASON SASSER, OFFICER J. BATCHELOR, OFFICER G. T. LAWS, CHIEF DEPUTY LARRY M. PIERCE, SERGEANT IRBY, SUPERVISOR Z. KINLAW, DEPUTY B. R. CROKER, JUDGE WILLIAM BLAND and CHIEF D.A. MATTHEW DELBRIDGE |
| 22-7384 |
| November 30, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Emmanuel McGriff El v. Centralize Infraction Bureau |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RESTRICTED ACCESS DOCUMENT (court & party access only) filed by Emmanuel Lee McGriff El. Document containing other people's personal information folded up and used as envelope. Nothing mailed in the envelope. [1001291245] [22-7384] KS [Entered: 12/30/2022 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT to [ # 6 ] informal opening brief (titled as, "Formal Sovereign Oath of Renunciation In Support of Informal Brief" and "Affidavit of Fact In Support of Informal Brief") by Emmanuel Lee McGriff El. [1001286618] [22-7384] KS [Entered: 12/20/2022 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT to [ # 6 ] informal opening brief (titled as, "Memorandum of Law In Support of Informal Brief") by Emmanuel Lee McGriff El. [1001286613] [22-7384] KS [Entered: 12/20/2022 12:08 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER filed granting Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [7] Fee Amount: $505.00. Name and Prisoner Number: Emmanuel Lee McGriff El, #69806. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Emmanuel Lee McGriff El, #69806, WAYNE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, P. O. Box 1877, Goldsboro, NC 27530-0000; Warden, ATTN: Acounting Office, WAYNE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; P. O. Box 1877, Goldsboro, NC 27530-0000. [1001281287] [22-7384] KS [Entered: 12/12/2022 04:33 PM]
|
| Filing 7 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Emmanuel Lee McGriff El. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: Yes. [1001281274] [22-7384] KS [Entered: 12/12/2022 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Emmanuel Lee McGriff El. [1001281270] [22-7384] KS [Entered: 12/12/2022 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:22-ct-03311-D-RJ. Record in folder or on docket? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001275230] [22-7384] KS [Entered: 12/01/2022 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 12/14/2022.[1001274976] [22-7384] KS [Entered: 11/30/2022 04:57 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Emmanuel Lee McGriff El, #69806, WAYNE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, P. O. Box 1877, Goldsboro, NC 27530-0000. [1001274972] Informal Opening Brief due 12/27/2022. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-7384] KS [Entered: 11/30/2022 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Emmanuel Lee McGriff El ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Emmanuel Lee McGriff El, #69806, WAYNE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, P. O. Box 1877, Goldsboro, NC 27530-0000. [1001274969] [22-7384] KS [Entered: 11/30/2022 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:22-ct-03311-D-RJ. Case manager: KStump. [1001274963] [22-7384] KS [Entered: 11/30/2022 04:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
