Saquan Musgrove v. Correctional Officer Moore
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE |
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOORE and OFFICER A. JONES |
22-7430 |
December 14, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Saquan S. Musgrove re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Informal Opening Brief due 02/21/2023. PLRA documents due 02/21/2023. [1001309923] [22-7430] RHS [Entered: 02/03/2023 08:12 AM] |
Filing 6 PLRA/IFP-TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT (court access only) by Saquan S. Musgrove. [1001301653] [22-7430] RHS [Entered: 01/19/2023 04:17 PM] |
Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-00164-CCE-JLW. Record in folder or on docket? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001283268] [22-7430] RHS [Entered: 12/14/2022 02:50 PM] |
Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001282917]. Due: 12/28/2022. [22-7430] RHS [Entered: 12/14/2022 11:50 AM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed.. [1001282913] Informal Opening Brief due 01/09/2023 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-7430] RHS [Entered: 12/14/2022 11:49 AM] |
Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Saquan S. Musgrove ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days.. [1001282909] [22-7430] RHS [Entered: 12/14/2022 11:47 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-00164-CCE-JLW. Case manager: RSewell. [1001282905] [22-7430] RHS [Entered: 12/14/2022 11:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.