In re: Shongo Owens
| In re: SHONGO LECARR OWENS, a/k/a G.O., a/k/a Chuck |
| 23-1108 |
| January 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 1:15-cr-00468-CCB-1. Mailed to: Shongo Lecarr Owens. [1001307828] [23-1108] CP [Entered: 01/31/2023 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Shongo Lecarr Owens - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 02/15/2023. Originating case number: 1:15-cr-00468-CCB-1. Mailed to: Shongo Lecarr Owens. [1001307810] [23-1108] CP [Entered: 01/31/2023 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:15-cr-00468-CCB-1. Case manager: CPoulsen. [1001307653] [23-1108] CP [Entered: 01/31/2023 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Shongo Lecarr Owens. [1001307656] [23-1108] CP [Entered: 01/31/2023 01:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Shongo Owens | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: SHONGO LECARR OWENS, a/k/a G.O., a/k/a Chuck | |
| Represented By: | Shongo Lecarr Owens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
