Daundra Grier v. HUD
| DAUNDRA GRIER |
| HUD, c/o Attorney General of the United States, HOUSING AUTHORITY OF ELKTON MARYLAND, HOUSING AUTHORITY OF DALLAS TEXAS and U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND |
| 23-1310 |
| March 22, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Federal Employers Liability |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Daundra Grier re: failure to file informal brief. Mailed to: Daundra Grier. [1001353203] [23-1310] JSN [Entered: 04/20/2023 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Matthew A. Haven for HUD. [1001338924] [23-1310] Matthew Haven [Entered: 03/27/2023 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Housing Authority of Elkton Maryland. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001338565] [23-1310] Carrie Riley [Entered: 03/27/2023 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Carrie Blackburn Riley for Housing Authority of Elkton Maryland. [1001338541] [23-1310] Carrie Riley [Entered: 03/27/2023 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001336591]. Due: 04/05/2023. [23-1310] JSN [Entered: 03/22/2023 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. [1001336589] Informal Opening Brief due 04/17/2023. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. Mailed to: Daundra Grier.[23-1310] JSN [Entered: 03/22/2023 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 8:21-cv-02165-PX. Case manager: JeffNeal. [1001336582] [23-1310] JSN [Entered: 03/22/2023 02:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
