In re: Stephen Nivens
| In re: STEPHEN NIVENS |
| 23-1353 |
| April 4, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Mailed to: Stephen Nivens and Anthony Brown. [1001343255] [23-1353] RE [Entered: 04/04/2023 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 4 FEE NOTICE issued to Stephen Nivens - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 04/19/2023. Mailed to: Stephen Nivens. [1001343253] [23-1353] RE [Entered: 04/04/2023 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number:. Case manager: REdwards. [1001343163] [23-1353] RE [Entered: 04/04/2023 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 3 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Stephen Nivens. [1001343168] [23-1353] RE [Entered: 04/04/2023 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for extraordinary writ under FRAP 21 filed by Stephen Nivens. [1001343167] [23-1353] RE [Entered: 04/04/2023 10:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Stephen Nivens | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: STEPHEN NIVENS | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Nivens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
