In re: Siddhanth Sharma
In re: SIDDHANTH SHARMA |
23-1358 |
April 5, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Docket correction requested from Siddhanth Sharma. [1001344846] [23-1358] RHS [Entered: 04/06/2023 11:04 AM] |
Filing 5 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus Originating case number: 5:22-cv-00059-BO. [1001343889] [23-1358] RHS [Entered: 04/05/2023 09:32 AM] |
Filing 4 Filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $500.00. Receipt Number: 4CCA004240. [1001343852] [23-1358] RHS [Entered: 04/05/2023 09:15 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:22-cv-00059-BO. Case manager: RSewell. [1001343792] [23-1358] RHS [Entered: 04/05/2023 08:41 AM] |
Filing 3 Emergency MOTION by Siddhanth Sharma for single judge consideration; to accelerate case processing. Date and method of service: 04/04/2023 US mail. [1001343806] [23-1358]. [1001343806] RHS [Entered: 04/05/2023 08:53 AM] |
Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Siddhanth Sharma. [1001343804] [23-1358] RHS [Entered: 04/05/2023 08:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Siddhanth Sharma | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: SIDDHANTH SHARMA | |
Represented By: | Siddhanth Sharma |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.