Alexandra Romero v. Merrick Garland
ALEXANDRA Y. ROMERO and J.A.R.R. |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
23-1559 |
May 24, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Alexandra Romero v. Merrick Garland |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Duncan T. Fulton for Merrick B. Garland. [1001373552] [23-1559] Duncan Fulton [Entered: 05/24/2023 04:32 PM] |
Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Elizabeth M. Dewar for Merrick B. Garland. [1001373376] [23-1559] Elizabeth Dewar [Entered: 05/24/2023 02:31 PM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE ISSUED re: case caption. [1001373344] [23-1559] KH [Entered: 05/24/2023 02:07 PM] |
Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record. Date petition for review or application filed: 05/24/2023. [ # 1 ] petition for review. [1001373335] Administrative Record due 07/03/2023. [23-1559] KH [Entered: 05/24/2023 01:59 PM] |
Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] petition for review. Originating case number: A209-219-195, A209-219-196. [1001373316] [23-1559] KH [Entered: 05/24/2023 01:46 PM] |
Filing 2 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $500.00. Receipt Number: A04-73875-96. [1001373312] [23-1559] KH [Entered: 05/24/2023 01:42 PM] |
Filing 1 Petition for review of agency order filed by J.A.R.R. and Alexandra Y. Romero .[1001373304] [23-1559] KH [Entered: 05/24/2023 01:38 PM] |
Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case number: A209-219-195, A209-219-196. Case manager: KHancock. [1001373284] [23-1559] KH [Entered: 05/24/2023 01:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.