Nancy Herrera-Manzanares v. Merrick Garland
| NANCY CAROLINA HERRERA-MANZANARES and M.S.O.H. |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
| 23-1668 |
| June 23, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Katie E. Rourke for Merrick B. Garland. [1001390241] [23-1668] Katie Rourke [Entered: 06/23/2023 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record. Date petition for review or application filed: 06/23/2023. [ # 2 ] petition for review. Mailed to: Field Office Director Enforcement and Removal Operations Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Washington Field Office 14797 Murdock Street Chantilly, VA 20151. [1001390180] Administrative Record due 08/02/2023 [23-1668] RE [Entered: 06/23/2023 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1001390170-2 ] immigration appeal. Originating case number: A202-087-107,A202-087-108. [1001390174] [23-1668] RE [Entered: 06/23/2023 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for review of agency order filed by Nancy Carolina Herrera-Manzanares and M.S.O.H. .[1001390173] [23-1668] RE [Entered: 06/23/2023 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $500.00. Receipt Number: A04-74024-166. [1001390171] [23-1668] RE [Entered: 06/23/2023 11:46 AM] |
| Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case number: A202-087-107,A202-087-108. Case manager: REdwards. [1001390170] [23-1668] RE [Entered: 06/23/2023 11:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
