Konijte Hadgu v. Merrick Garland
| KONIJTE ABERA HADGU, GASHEW HILMARIA DEGEFU and A.G.H. |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
| 23-1677 |
| June 26, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record. Date petition for review or application filed: 06/26/2023. [ # 2 ] petition for review. Mailed to: Field Office Director, Baltimore Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations, 31 Hopkins Plaza, 6th floor, Baltimore,MD 21201. [1001392015] Administrative Record due 08/07/2023. [23-1677] NRS [Entered: 06/27/2023 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] petition for review. Originating case number: A208-899-193,A208-899-192,A208-899-194,A208-899-195. Mailed to: Field Office Director, Baltimore Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations, 31 Hopkins Plaza, 6th floor, Baltimore,MD 21201. [1001391999] [23-1677] NRS [Entered: 06/27/2023 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 1 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $500.00. Receipt Number: A04-74027-121. [1001391979] [23-1677] NRS [Entered: 06/27/2023 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for review of agency order filed by A.G.H., A.G.H., Gashew Hilmaria Degefu and Konijte Abera Hadgu .[1001391987] [23-1677] NRS [Entered: 06/27/2023 09:49 AM] |
| Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case number: A-208-899-193,A208-899-192,A208-899-194,A-208-899-195. Case manager: NaeemahSims. [1001391696] [23-1677] NRS [Entered: 06/26/2023 08:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
