In re: Roy Smith
In re: ROY MANDELL SMITH |
23-1804 |
August 4, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Docket correction requested from Roy Mandell Smith. Mailed to: Roy Smith. [1001415035] [23-1804] CH [Entered: 08/04/2023 11:01 AM] |
Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus. Originating case number: 1:22-cv-01306-MSN-WEF. Mailed to: Roy Smith. [1001415030] [23-1804] CH [Entered: 08/04/2023 10:58 AM] |
Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Roy Mandell Smith ]. Fee due to Court of Appeals or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Roy Smith. [1001415026] [23-1804] CH [Entered: 08/04/2023 10:57 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:22-cv-01306-MSN-WEF. Case manager: CHalupa. [1001415014] [23-1804] CH [Entered: 08/04/2023 10:50 AM] |
Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Roy Mandell Smith. [1001415021] [23-1804] CH [Entered: 08/04/2023 10:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Roy Smith | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: ROY MANDELL SMITH | |
Represented By: | Roy Mandell Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.