Barry Scharbrough v. Commissioner, Social Security
| BARRY L. SCHARBROUGH, c/o Mary Ann Scharbrough |
| COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 23-1830 |
| August 11, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| D.I.W.C./D.I.W.W. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION by Barry L. Scharbrough to extend filing time for opening brief and appendix until November 9, 2023.. Date and method of service: 10/08/2023 ecf. [1001452253] [23-1830] Andrew Sindler [Entered: 10/08/2023 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 10 BRIEFING ORDER filed. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. All filings must comply with # Appendix Pagination & Brief Citation Guide . [1001428577] Opening Brief and Appendix due 10/10/2023. Response Brief due 11/09/2023. [23-1830] KS [Entered: 08/28/2023 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 9 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD in electronic format by Commissioner, Social Security Administration. Method of service: ECF service on counsel. [1001428571] [23-1830] Erica Adams [Entered: 08/28/2023 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Erica Adams for Commissioner, Social Security Administration. [1001428544] [23-1830] Erica Adams [Entered: 08/28/2023 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 7 Initial mediation conference scheduled. [1001425308] [23-1830] LHP [Entered: 08/22/2023 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD requested (counseled cases) . Was administrative record filed in electronic form in district court? Yes. [1001419663] Administrative Record (Social Security) due 08/28/2023. [23-1830] KS [Entered: 08/14/2023 09:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Barry L. Scharbrough.. [1001419553] [23-1830] Andrew Sindler [Entered: 08/11/2023 05:25 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Barry L. Scharbrough. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001419552] [23-1830] Andrew Sindler [Entered: 08/11/2023 05:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Andrew N Sindler for Barry L. Scharbrough. [1001419551] [23-1830] Andrew Sindler [Entered: 08/11/2023 05:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1001418817-2 ] social security case. Originating case number: 1:22-cv-02421-BAH. [1001418823] [23-1830] KS [Entered: 08/11/2023 09:01 AM] |
| Social Security case docketed. Originating case number: 1:22-cv-02421-BAH. Date notice of appeal filed: 08/09/2023. Case manager: KStump. [1001418817] [23-1830] KS [Entered: 08/11/2023 08:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Barry Scharbrough v. Commissioner, Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: BARRY L. SCHARBROUGH, c/o Mary Ann Scharbrough | |
| Represented By: | Andrew N. Sindler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | |
| Represented By: | Erica Adams |
| Represented By: | Kelly Marie Marzullo |
| Represented By: | Samantha Lynn Zeiler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
