Amanda Mayes v. City of Norfolk, Virginia
Plaintiff / Appellant: AMANDA R. MAYES
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
Case Number: 23-1840
Filed: August 14, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER filed extending briefing order deadlines. Opening brief and appendix due 11/08/2023. Response brief due 12/11/2023. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. Copies to all parties. [1001442325] [23-1840] EB [Entered: 09/20/2023 09:13 AM]
September 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER filed extending briefing order deadlines. Opening brief and appendix due 10/10/2023. Response brief due 11/09/2023. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. Copies to all parties. [1001438142] [23-1840] EB [Entered: 09/13/2023 11:33 AM]
September 6, 2023 Filing 9 Initial mediation conference scheduled. [1001433639] [23-1840] JCS [Entered: 09/06/2023 08:21 AM]
August 25, 2023 Filing 8 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Amanda R. Mayes.. [1001427775] [23-1840] Wayne Montgomery [Entered: 08/25/2023 09:56 PM]
August 25, 2023 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Amanda R. Mayes. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001427774] [23-1840] Wayne Montgomery [Entered: 08/25/2023 09:56 PM]
August 25, 2023 Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Wayne Barry Montgomery for Amanda R. Mayes. [1001427773] [23-1840] Wayne Montgomery [Entered: 08/25/2023 09:54 PM]
August 18, 2023 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by City of Norfolk, Virginia. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001423598] [23-1840] Bonnie Lane [Entered: 08/18/2023 03:27 PM]
August 18, 2023 Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Bonnie P. Lane for City of Norfolk, Virginia. [1001423594] [23-1840] Bonnie Lane [Entered: 08/18/2023 03:25 PM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 3 BRIEFING ORDER filed. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. All filings must comply with # Appendix Pagination & Brief Citation Guide . [1001419828] Opening Brief and Appendix due 09/25/2023. Response Brief due 10/25/2023. [23-1840] EB [Entered: 08/14/2023 10:56 AM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 2:22-cv-00246-AWA-RJK. [1001419826] [23-1840] EB [Entered: 08/14/2023 10:55 AM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:22-cv-00246-AWA-RJK. Case manager: EBorneisen. [1001419825] [23-1840] EB [Entered: 08/14/2023 10:54 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Amanda Mayes v. City of Norfolk, Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: AMANDA R. MAYES
Represented By: Wayne Barry Montgomery Esq. Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
Represented By: Michael Beverly
Represented By: Bonnie Patricia Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?