Edward McKee v. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
| EDWARD BERNARD MCKEE |
| NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY |
| 23-1848 |
| August 15, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Edward McKee v. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 9 ]. Number of days granted: 30. Informal Opening Brief due 10/23/2023. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Edward McKee. [1001443641] [23-1848] RE [Entered: 09/21/2023 03:10 PM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION by Edward Bernard McKee to extend filing time for informal opening brief for 30 days. [1001443638] [23-1848] RE [Entered: 09/21/2023 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 8 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Edward McKee. [1001428635] Informal Opening Brief due 09/21/2023 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [23-1848] RE [Entered: 08/28/2023 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 7 Attorney Phillip T. Reynolds for North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality in 23-1848 terminated from case. Reason for termination: Not participating. [1001428632] [23-1848] RE [Entered: 08/28/2023 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 6 Attorney Lindsey Bullard for Edward Bernard McKee in 23-1848, Stanley B. Green for Edward Bernard McKee in 23-1848, Dawn T. Mistretta for Edward Bernard McKee in 23-1848 terminated from case. Reason for termination: Not participating. [1001428630] [23-1848] RE [Entered: 08/28/2023 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Edward Bernard McKee. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001428628] [23-1848] RE [Entered: 08/28/2023 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 STATUS OF COUNSEL FORM-WAIVER by Edward Bernard McKee. [1001428627] [23-1848] RE [Entered: 08/28/2023 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Christine M. Ryan for North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. [1001427993] [23-1848] Christine Ryan [Entered: 08/28/2023 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE ISSUED to Edward Bernard McKee re: status of counsel. Mailed to: Lindsey Bullard, Dawn T. Mistretta, Phillip T. Reynolds and Edward Bernard McKee. [1001421138] Status of Counsel due 08/25/2023. [23-1848] RE [Entered: 08/15/2023 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:22-cv-00409-BO-RN. Case manager: REdwards. [1001421014] [23-1848] RE [Entered: 08/15/2023 02:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Edward McKee v. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: EDWARD BERNARD MCKEE | |
| Represented By: | Lindsey Bullard |
| Represented By: | Stanley B. Green |
| Represented By: | Edward Bernard McKee |
| Represented By: | Dawn T. Mistretta |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY | |
| Represented By: | Phillip T. Reynolds |
| Represented By: | Christine Ryan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
