Semaria Gass v. U.S. Dept of EEOC
| SEMARIA GASS |
| EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, U.S. FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM, MECKLENBURG COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and MECKLENBURG COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT |
| 23-1907 |
| August 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Semaria Gass re: failure to satisfy fee and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Semaria Gass. [1001451946] [23-1907] RP [Entered: 10/06/2023 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 FEE NOTICE issued to Semaria Gass - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 10/02/2023. Originating case number: 3:23-cv-00504-FDW-SCR. Mailed to: Semaria Gass. [1001431173] [23-1907] RP [Entered: 08/31/2023 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001431145]. Due: 09/14/2023. [23-1907] RP [Entered: 08/31/2023 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Semaria Gass. [1001431135] Informal Opening Brief due 09/25/2023. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [23-1907] RP [Entered: 08/31/2023 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 2 IFP APPLICATION transferred from district court (court access only). [1001431129] [23-1907] RP [Entered: 08/31/2023 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:23-cv-00504-FDW-SCR. Case manager: RachelPhillips. [1001431127] [23-1907] RP [Entered: 08/31/2023 11:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
