In re: Jim Robinson, III
In re: JIM ROBINSON, III |
23-1936 |
September 8, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Docket correction requested from Jim Robinson, III re: petition for writ of mandamus. Mailed to: Jim Robinson. [1001435556] [23-1936] CH [Entered: 09/08/2023 10:50 AM] |
Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus. Originating case number: 5:23-hc-02077-M. Mailed to: Jim Robinson. [1001435544] [23-1936] CH [Entered: 09/08/2023 10:45 AM] |
Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Jim Robinson, III - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 09/25/2023. Originating case number: 5:23-hc-02077-M. Mailed to: Jim Robinson. [1001435531] [23-1936] CH [Entered: 09/08/2023 10:36 AM] |
Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Jim Robinson, III. [1001435527] [23-1936] CH [Entered: 09/08/2023 10:35 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:23-hc-02077-M. Case manager: CHalupa. [1001435522] [23-1936] CH [Entered: 09/08/2023 10:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Jim Robinson, III | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: JIM ROBINSON, III | |
Represented By: | Jim Robinson III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.