V.E. v. University of Maryland Baltimore County, Maryland
Plaintiff / Appellant: V.E.
Defendant / Appellee: UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND AT BALTIMORE, COUNTY
Case Number: 23-1955
Filed: September 13, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER filed extending briefing order deadlines. Opening brief and appendix due 11/30/2023. Response brief due 01/16/2024. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. Copies to all parties. [1001459052] [23-1955] AW [Entered: 10/20/2023 10:20 AM]
October 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER filed extending briefing schedule. Opening brief and appendix due 11/06/2023. Response brief due 12/06/2023. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. Copies to all parties. [1001452740] [23-1955] AW [Entered: 10/10/2023 12:57 PM]
September 27, 2023 Filing 9 Initial mediation conference scheduled. [1001446225] [23-1955] JCS [Entered: 09/27/2023 09:41 AM]
September 26, 2023 Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by University of Maryland at Baltimore, County. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001445441] [23-1955] Ann Sheridan [Entered: 09/26/2023 10:47 AM]
September 26, 2023 Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Ann M. Sheridan for University of Maryland at Baltimore, County. [1001445436] [23-1955] Ann Sheridan [Entered: 09/26/2023 10:46 AM]
September 25, 2023 Filing 6 DOCKETING STATEMENT by V.E... [1001444958] [23-1955] Rignal Baldwin [Entered: 09/25/2023 03:05 PM]
September 25, 2023 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by V.E.. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001444954] [23-1955] Rignal Baldwin [Entered: 09/25/2023 03:03 PM]
September 25, 2023 Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Rignal Woodward Baldwin V for V.E.. [1001444945] [23-1955] Rignal Baldwin [Entered: 09/25/2023 02:59 PM]
September 13, 2023 Filing 3 BRIEFING ORDER filed. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. All filings must comply with # Appendix Pagination & Brief Citation Guide . [1001438159] Opening Brief and Appendix due 10/23/2023. Response Brief due 11/22/2023 [23-1955] AW [Entered: 09/13/2023 11:36 AM]
September 13, 2023 Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 1:22-cv-02338-JRR. [1001438132] [23-1955] AW [Entered: 09/13/2023 11:29 AM]
September 13, 2023 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:22-cv-02338-JRR. Case manager: AWalker. [1001438130] [23-1955] AW [Entered: 09/13/2023 11:24 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: V.E. v. University of Maryland Baltimore County, Maryland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: V.E.
Represented By: Rignal Woodward Baldwin V
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND AT BALTIMORE, COUNTY
Represented By: Ann M. Sheridan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?