Ronald Emrit v. University of Virginia
| RONALD SATISH EMRIT |
| UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ADAMS & GARTH, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, (NAACP), EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, (EEOC) and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, (DOJ) Civil Rights Division |
| 23-2060 |
| October 12, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Ronald Satish Emrit re: failure to satisfy fee requirements. Mailed to: Ronald Emrit. [1001476909] [23-2060] RP [Entered: 11/20/2023 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 6 CHANGE OF ADDRESS Notice by Ronald Satish Emrit. [1001472958] [23-2060] RP [Entered: 11/14/2023 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Ronald Satish Emrit. [1001472711] [23-2060] RP [Entered: 11/13/2023 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001454233]. Due: 10/26/2023. [23-2060] RP [Entered: 10/12/2023 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Ronald Emrit. [1001454229] Informal Opening Brief due 11/06/2023. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [23-2060] RP [Entered: 10/12/2023 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Ronald Satish Emrit - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 11/13/2023. Originating case number: 3:23-cv-00017-RSB. Mailed to: Ronald Emrit. [1001454224] [23-2060] RP [Entered: 10/12/2023 08:49 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:23-cv-00017-RSB. Case manager: RachelPhillips. [1001454220] [23-2060] RP [Entered: 10/12/2023 08:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
